Self-Burial or The Disappearance of the Artist; also: Self-Burial (Television Interference Project)
With the emergence of Conceptual art, many artists argued that
art should be an activity or an experience, instead of simply an
object. Self Burial is an ironic and humorous response. As Arnatt
wrote, 'the continual reference to the disappearance of the art
object suggested to me the eventual disappearance of the artist
himsel'. These photos were first broadcast on German television
in October 1969. One photo was shown each day, for about two seconds.
They were neither announced nor explained viewers had to
make what sense of them they could. (From the display caption July
2005. (The Tate Collection www.tate.org.uk/servlet/ViewWork?workid=589&searchid=16566)
With no announcement or further commentary, WDR 3 television inserted into the programmes showing between 11 and 18 October 1969 a series of nine photographs depicting Arnatt gradually sinking into the ground. Two consecutive photos were shown each evening, the first one at 8.15pm, directly after the main news broadcast, the second one in the middle of whatever programme was running at 9.15pm. The enigma was solved at the end of the one-week series by an interview with the artist. As Arnatt explained, the series was not created specifically for TV transmission: 'It was originally made as a comment upon the notion of the «disappearance of the art object». It seemed a logical corollary that the artist should also disappear.'
(Medienkunstnetz www.medienkunstnetz.de/works/self-burial/)
October 11-18, 1969: Keith Arnatt's 'Self-Burial', executed earlier
in the year in Tintern, England [sic!], is transmitted on German
television under the auspices of Gerry Schum. The piece consists
of nine photographs showing Arnatt processively sinking into the
earth. Each one was shown twice each day for two seconds, cut into
the daily television programming, with no introduction or commentary.
(Lucy Lippard, Six Years: The dematerialization
of the art object from 1966 to 1972, Berkeley: University of
California Press 1997 (1973), p.119)
|